Filed: Dec. 31, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-1502 _ Jilani Haye Jama lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: December 26, 2013 Filed: December 31, 2013 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jilani Haye Jama petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration A
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-1502 _ Jilani Haye Jama lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: December 26, 2013 Filed: December 31, 2013 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jilani Haye Jama petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Ap..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1502
___________________________
Jilani Haye Jama
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: December 26, 2013
Filed: December 31, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jilani Haye Jama petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals, which upheld an immigration judge’s adverse decision. After careful
consideration of the petition, we find no basis for reversal. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i)-(ii) (no court shall have jurisdiction to review grant or denial of
discretionary relief); Fofanah v. Gonzales,
447 F.3d 1037, 1040 (8th Cir. 2006)
(adverse credibility finding was fatal to claims for asylum, withholding of removal,
and relief under Convention Against Torture because they were all based upon same
discredited testimony). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-