Filed: Nov. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-1785 _ Mauricio E. Villalobos lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: November 6, 2013 Filed: November 8, 2013 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mauricio Villalobos, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of a
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-1785 _ Mauricio E. Villalobos lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: November 6, 2013 Filed: November 8, 2013 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mauricio Villalobos, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1785
___________________________
Mauricio E. Villalobos
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: November 6, 2013
Filed: November 8, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Mauricio Villalobos, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), affirming an immigration judge’s
decision denying him withholding of removal. After careful review, we find no basis
for granting the petition, as the BIA’s denial of relief was supported by substantial
evidence on the record as a whole. See Wijono v. Gonzales,
439 F.3d 868, 872 (8th
Cir. 2006) (substantial-evidence standard for denial of withholding of removal).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-