Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mei Di Cao v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 13-2436 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 13-2436 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-2436 _ Mei Di Cao lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: April 2, 2014 Filed: April 7, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Chinese citizen Mei Di Cao petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeal
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 13-2436
                         ___________________________

                                      Mei Di Cao

                              lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                            v.

             Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

                             lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                     ____________

                       Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                              Submitted: April 2, 2014
                                Filed: April 7, 2014
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                       ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Chinese citizen Mei Di Cao petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. After
careful review, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion. See Averianova v. Holder, 
592 F.3d 931
, 936-37 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard
of review). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer