Filed: Jul. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-3552 _ Revelle Loving lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Thomas Roy; Kent Grandlienard; David Reishus; Lcie Stevenson; Michael Green; Charles Tobritzhofer; Bradley Gross; Rodney Rivard; Graham Besonen; Nick Ploussard; Aaron Johnson; Micsone Klin; Zackery Nuehring lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: July 22, 2014 Fi
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-3552 _ Revelle Loving lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Thomas Roy; Kent Grandlienard; David Reishus; Lcie Stevenson; Michael Green; Charles Tobritzhofer; Bradley Gross; Rodney Rivard; Graham Besonen; Nick Ploussard; Aaron Johnson; Micsone Klin; Zackery Nuehring lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: July 22, 2014 Fil..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3552
___________________________
Revelle Loving
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Thomas Roy; Kent Grandlienard; David Reishus; Lcie Stevenson; Michael Green;
Charles Tobritzhofer; Bradley Gross; Rodney Rivard; Graham Besonen; Nick
Ploussard; Aaron Johnson; Micsone Klin; Zackery Nuehring
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: July 22, 2014
Filed: July 25, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Inmate Revelle Loving appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Mason v. Corr.
Med. Servs., Inc.,
559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir. 2009), we find no basis for
reversing the district court’s well-reasoned decision, and Loving has offered none.2
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
2
We decline to consider the new material Loving offers on appeal. See Maxa
v. John Alden Life Ins. Co.,
972 F.2d 980, 983 (8th Cir. 1992).
-2-