Filed: Jun. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-3784 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Antonio Ventura-Fuentes lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: June 5, 2014 Filed: June 10, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Antonio Ventura-Fuentes directly appeals the downward-departure senten
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-3784 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Antonio Ventura-Fuentes lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: June 5, 2014 Filed: June 10, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Antonio Ventura-Fuentes directly appeals the downward-departure sentenc..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3784
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Antonio Ventura-Fuentes
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: June 5, 2014
Filed: June 10, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Antonio Ventura-Fuentes directly appeals the downward-departure sentence
imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. On appeal,
1
The Honorable D.P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
counsel for Ventura-Fuentes seeks to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable. Upon
careful review, we conclude that Ventura-Fuentes’s sentence is not unreasonable. See
United States v. Burns,
577 F.3d 887, 894-896 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (appellate
review of departure sentence). Having reviewed the record independently under
Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Therefore,
we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-