Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Matthew White v. Carolyn Colvin, 14-1339 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 14-1339 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1339 _ Matthew T. White lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph _ Submitted: October 23, 2014 Filed: October 29, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Matthew T. White appeals
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 14-1339
                        ___________________________

                                  Matthew T. White

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                            v.

   Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                                      ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph
                                 ____________

                            Submitted: October 23, 2014
                             Filed: October 29, 2014
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Matthew T. White appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of
child’s insurance benefits. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the administrative

      1
       The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
law judge’s (ALJ’s) opinion is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a
whole, including new evidence the Appeals Council considered. See Davidson v.
Astrue, 
501 F.3d 987
, 989-90 (8th Cir. 2007). Specifically, we find no validity to the
challenges White raises to the ALJ’s determination of his residual functional capacity
(RFC). See Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 
390 F.3d 584
, 591 (8th Cir. 2004) (claimant has
burden of establishing RFC; factors in RFC determination). The judgment of the
district court is affirmed.
                         ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer