Filed: Feb. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-3700 _ Michael A. Dean; Pat Edmonds lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants Jean P. Gibson Plaintiff v. Supt. Michael Bowersox; Patricia Cornell; Don Roper; Ricky Fisher; Terrena Ballinger; Mike Kemna; Dwayne Kempker; Greg Hadley; Troy Wade; John Rogers; Waylon Wilson; Kenneth Leeder; LaDonna M. Buckner; Princess Fahnestock; Missouri Department of Corrections lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United Sta
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-3700 _ Michael A. Dean; Pat Edmonds lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants Jean P. Gibson Plaintiff v. Supt. Michael Bowersox; Patricia Cornell; Don Roper; Ricky Fisher; Terrena Ballinger; Mike Kemna; Dwayne Kempker; Greg Hadley; Troy Wade; John Rogers; Waylon Wilson; Kenneth Leeder; LaDonna M. Buckner; Princess Fahnestock; Missouri Department of Corrections lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United Stat..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3700
___________________________
Michael A. Dean; Pat Edmonds
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants
Jean P. Gibson
Plaintiff
v.
Supt. Michael Bowersox; Patricia Cornell; Don Roper; Ricky Fisher; Terrena
Ballinger; Mike Kemna; Dwayne Kempker; Greg Hadley; Troy Wade; John
Rogers; Waylon Wilson; Kenneth Leeder; LaDonna M. Buckner; Princess
Fahnestock; Missouri Department of Corrections
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: January 27, 2015
Filed: February 2, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Dean and Pat Edmonds brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
challenging, on First Amendment grounds, certain prison regulations related to
magazines allowed in their institution. Following an earlier remand by this court, the
district court1 entered a summary judgment decision against Dean and Edmonds, and
they appealed. Thereafter, this court ordered briefing regarding certain facial and
as-applied challenges. Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments in their briefs,
and after careful de novo review of the record, see Mack v. Dillon,
594 F.3d 620, 622
(8th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (standard of review for summary judgment), we conclude
that summary judgment was properly granted, see Thornburgh v. Abbott,
490 U.S.
401, 407-08, 418-19 (1989); Turner v. Safley,
482 U.S. 78, 89-91 (1987).
Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-