Evelyn Shaulis v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 14-1895 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 14-1895
Visitors: 38
Filed: Jan. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1895 _ Evelyn D. Shaulis lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: January 7, 2015 Filed: January 14, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Evelyn D. Shaulis appeals from the order o
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1895 _ Evelyn D. Shaulis lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: January 7, 2015 Filed: January 14, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Evelyn D. Shaulis appeals from the order of..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1895
___________________________
Evelyn D. Shaulis
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: January 7, 2015
Filed: January 14, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Evelyn D. Shaulis appeals from the order of the District Court1 affirming the
denial of her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security
income. Following careful review, we find no reversible error based on the
administrative law judge’s assessment of Shaulis’s credibility and her residual
functional capacity, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the District Court. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-
Source: CourtListener