Filed: Jan. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-2119 _ Penny L. Barton lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: January 6, 2015 Filed: January 14, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Penny L. Barton appeals t
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-2119 _ Penny L. Barton lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: January 6, 2015 Filed: January 14, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Penny L. Barton appeals th..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-2119
___________________________
Penny L. Barton
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: January 6, 2015
Filed: January 14, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Penny L. Barton appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of
disability insurance benefits. For reversal, Barton argues that the administrative law
judge (ALJ) erred (1) in assessing her residual functional capacity, and in failing to
assign appropriate weight to the findings of her treating and examining physicians
and other medical sources; (2) in finding that she was capable of performing her past
relevant work, and other work identified by a vocational expert; and (3) in failing to
consider all of the evidence in the record, including the observations of and
information provided by third parties. Following a careful and thorough review of
the record, we conclude that the ALJ’s determination is supported by substantial
evidence on the record as a whole, that Barton’s arguments do not support reversal,
and that an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Matt Jeffrey Whitworth, United States Magistrate Judge for
the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition
by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-