Filed: Apr. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-2959 _ Juan Raymundo-Bernabe lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: April 13, 2015 Filed: April 16, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Juan Raymundo-Bernabe, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an orde
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-2959 _ Juan Raymundo-Bernabe lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: April 13, 2015 Filed: April 16, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Juan Raymundo-Bernabe, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-2959
___________________________
Juan Raymundo-Bernabe
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: April 13, 2015
Filed: April 16, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Juan Raymundo-Bernabe, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s
decision to deny his application for cancellation of removal. After careful review, we
conclude that Raymundo-Bernabe has not raised a cognizable constitutional or legal
challenge to the decision below, and thus, that we lack jurisdiction to review the
arguments that he has raised in this matter. See Gomez-Perez v. Holder,
569 F.3d
370, 372-73 (8th Cir. 2009) (appeals court generally lacks jurisdiction to review
discretionary denial of cancellation of removal, but may review constitutional claims
or questions of law). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.
______________________________
-2-