Filed: Jul. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-3299 _ Securities and Exchange Commission lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Bryan S. Behrens lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant National Investments, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: July 13, 2015 Filed: July 31, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Bry
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-3299 _ Securities and Exchange Commission lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Bryan S. Behrens lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant National Investments, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: July 13, 2015 Filed: July 31, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Brya..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3299
___________________________
Securities and Exchange Commission
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Bryan S. Behrens
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
National Investments, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: July 13, 2015
Filed: July 31, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Bryan S. Behrens appeals the district court’s1 entry of final
judgment in this civil action. He raises numerous challenges to the conduct of the
receiver in this matter, the initiation of criminal proceedings against him, and the
entry of final judgment. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court
affirms.
Behrens’s various challenges are either foreclosed or precluded by the consent
judgment that he entered in 2008; are wholly unsupported; are improperly before this
court as issues that are being raised for the first time on appeal; or are plainly
meritless and do not warrant extended discussion. This court also finds no abuse of
discretion in the district court’s order holding Behrens liable for the amount reflected
in the final judgment. See SEC v. Razmilovic,
738 F.3d 14, 31-32 (2d Cir. 2013)
(standard of review).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
-2-