William Edwards v. Stephen Sparks, 14-3552 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 14-3552
Visitors: 26
Filed: May 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-3552 _ William Simpson Edwards lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Stephen E. Sparks lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee John Boilingcamp lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant Nancy Roth; John Hawk; Rebecca Bowker; Dave DeGrange; Harbans Deol; Coleen Kascel; Deb Nichols; Nick Ludwick; William Sperflage; Sheryl Dahm; John Baldwin lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for th
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-3552 _ William Simpson Edwards lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Stephen E. Sparks lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee John Boilingcamp lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant Nancy Roth; John Hawk; Rebecca Bowker; Dave DeGrange; Harbans Deol; Coleen Kascel; Deb Nichols; Nick Ludwick; William Sperflage; Sheryl Dahm; John Baldwin lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3552
___________________________
William Simpson Edwards
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Stephen E. Sparks
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
John Boilingcamp
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
Nancy Roth; John Hawk; Rebecca Bowker; Dave DeGrange; Harbans Deol;
Coleen Kascel; Deb Nichols; Nick Ludwick; William Sperflage; Sheryl Dahm;
John Baldwin
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: May 1, 2015
Filed: May 5, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Inmate William Simpson Edwards appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant
of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We agree with the district
court’s well-reasoned determination that the summary judgment record did not reveal
any genuine issues of material fact. See Allard v. Baldwin,
779 F.3d 768, 771 (8th
Cir. 2015) (de novo review). Because we find no basis for reversal, and Edwards
offers none, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Helen C. Adams, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-
Source: CourtListener