Filed: Dec. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1087 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Adekunle Olufemi Adetiloye lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo _ Submitted: November 30, 2015 Filed: December 3, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. This appeal follows a remand for consideration of additional eviden
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1087 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Adekunle Olufemi Adetiloye lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo _ Submitted: November 30, 2015 Filed: December 3, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. This appeal follows a remand for consideration of additional evidenc..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-1087
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Adekunle Olufemi Adetiloye
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of North Dakota - Fargo
____________
Submitted: November 30, 2015
Filed: December 3, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
This appeal follows a remand for consideration of additional evidence on the
issues of restitution and forfeiture in Adekunle Olufemi Adetiloye’s mail fraud case.
See United States v. Adetiloye,
716 F.3d 1030 (8th Cir. 2013), cert. denied,
134 S. Ct.
1775 (2014). He challenges the district court’s1 orders denying his motions to dismiss
the case for lack of personal jurisdiction, which he based on his alleged illegal
extradition. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
Adetiloye improperly seeks to raise the issue of extradition in an appeal
following a limited remand to address entirely different matters. See White v.
Kautzky,
494 F.3d 677, 680-81 (8th Cir. 2007); Brown v. Nutsch,
619 F.2d 758, 762
(8th Cir. 1980). His arguments also fail on their merits for the reasons stated by the
district court.
The judgment is affirmed. Adetiloye’s motion to strike the government’s brief
is denied.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of North Dakota.
-2-