Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. William Rose, Sr., 15-1570 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-1570 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1570 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. William Rose, Sr. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison _ Submitted: August 12, 2015 Filed: August 28, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. William Rose directly appeals after he pled guilty to a federal child- p
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 15-1570
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                                  William Rose, Sr.

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
                                 ____________

                            Submitted: August 12, 2015
                              Filed: August 28, 2015
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

     William Rose directly appeals after he pled guilty to a federal child-
pornography charge and the district court1 sentenced him below the calculated

      1
      The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas.
Guidelines range to eighteen months in prison. His counsel has moved to withdraw,
and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), challenging the
substantive reasonableness of Rose’s sentence.

      Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court properly weighed the
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and did not abuse its discretion in sentencing
Rose. See United States v. Franik, 
687 F.3d 988
, 990 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of
review); see also United States v. Lazarski, 
560 F.3d 731
, 733 (8th Cir. 2009).
Further, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
488 U.S. 75
(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

      The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
                     ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer