Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Charles Williams, 15-1616 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-1616 Visitors: 24
Filed: Oct. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1616 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Charles Wesley Williams lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City _ Submitted: October 5, 2015 Filed: October 14, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. At a supervised-release revocation hearing, Charles Williams
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 15-1616
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                         lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                            v.

                              Charles Wesley Williams

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                      Appeal from United States District Court
                for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
                                  ____________

                             Submitted: October 5, 2015
                              Filed: October 14, 2015
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

       At a supervised-release revocation hearing, Charles Williams admitted to the
district court1 that he had violated several of his release conditions while serving a


      1
        The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
period of supervised release on a federal criminal sentence. The court revoked
supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence of 21 months in prison--the
bottom of the Chapter 7 revocation range--and 1 year of additional supervised release.
On appeal, Williams contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because
it is greater than necessary to comply with the purposes of 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a). After
careful review, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. See United
States v. Miller, 
557 F.3d 910
, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The
judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
                         ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer