Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

James Watson v. Osceola Police Department, 15-1757 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-1757 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1757 _ James Watson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Osceola Police Department; Mississippi County Sheriff’s Department; Arkansas Parole Board lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro _ Submitted: October 15, 2015 Filed: November 6, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jam
More
                United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eighth Circuit
                      ___________________________

                              No. 15-1757
                      ___________________________

                                  James Watson

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

 Osceola Police Department; Mississippi County Sheriff’s Department; Arkansas
                                Parole Board

                    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                     ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro
                                 ____________

                         Submitted: October 15, 2015
                           Filed: November 6, 2015
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
       James Watson appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal,
without prejudice, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the
record and Watson’s arguments on appeal, we conclude that the dismissal was proper
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cooper v. Schriro, 
189 F.3d 781
, 783
(8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (§ 1915A dismissal is reviewed de novo). Accordingly,
the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer