Merle Schmidt v. State of Iowa, 15-1996 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 15-1996
Visitors: 28
Filed: Oct. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1996 _ Merle Richard Schmidt lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. State of Iowa lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: September 11, 2015 Filed: October 5, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d), Merle Schmidt removed state criminal pro
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1996 _ Merle Richard Schmidt lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. State of Iowa lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: September 11, 2015 Filed: October 5, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d), Merle Schmidt removed state criminal proc..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-1996
___________________________
Merle Richard Schmidt
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
State of Iowa
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: September 11, 2015
Filed: October 5, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d), Merle Schmidt removed state criminal
proceedings against him to the district court,1 which remanded the case to the state
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.
court. Schmidt appeals. After careful review, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction
to review the remand order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
______________________________
-2-
Source: CourtListener