Filed: Jan. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1031 _ BFC Gas Company, LC; BFC Electric Company, LC lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Gypsum Supply Co., doing business as Gypsum Supply Co. of Cedar Rapids lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: December 7, 2015 Filed: January 26, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER C
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1031 _ BFC Gas Company, LC; BFC Electric Company, LC lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Gypsum Supply Co., doing business as Gypsum Supply Co. of Cedar Rapids lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: December 7, 2015 Filed: January 26, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CU..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-1031
___________________________
BFC Gas Company, LC; BFC Electric Company, LC
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Gypsum Supply Co., doing business as Gypsum Supply Co. of Cedar Rapids
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: December 7, 2015
Filed: January 26, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this diversity action involving negligence claims, BFC Gas Company and
BFC Electric Company appeal from the order and judgment of the District Court1
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.
excluding their expert witness opinions and granting Gypsum Supply Company’s
motion for summary judgment. Following careful review, we affirm these rulings for
the reasons given in the District Court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. To the extent
appellants challenge the subsequent order imposing sanctions, we lack jurisdiction
because appellants did not timely appeal this order. See Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co.,
440 F.3d 920, 924 (8th Cir. 2006). We deny the pending motion to supplement the
record.
______________________________
-2-