Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Maud Opoku-Agyeman v. Loretta E. Lynch, 15-2679 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-2679 Visitors: 27
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2679 _ Maud Opoku-Agyeman lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: May 13, 2016 Filed: May 17, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Maud Opoku-Agyeman, a citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board o
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 15-2679
                        ___________________________

                             Maud Opoku-Agyeman

                            lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                          v.

             Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States

                           lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                   ____________

                      Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: May 13, 2016
                              Filed: May 17, 2016
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Maud Opoku-Agyeman, a citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her
application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We conclude
that the arguments she presents to this court are unavailing, and thus we deny the
petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                            _______________________

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer