Maud Opoku-Agyeman v. Loretta E. Lynch, 15-2679 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 15-2679
Visitors: 43
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2679 _ Maud Opoku-Agyeman lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: May 13, 2016 Filed: May 17, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Maud Opoku-Agyeman, a citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board o
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2679 _ Maud Opoku-Agyeman lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: May 13, 2016 Filed: May 17, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Maud Opoku-Agyeman, a citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2679
___________________________
Maud Opoku-Agyeman
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: May 13, 2016
Filed: May 17, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Maud Opoku-Agyeman, a citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her
application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We conclude
that the arguments she presents to this court are unavailing, and thus we deny the
petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
_______________________
Source: CourtListener