James Lewis v. United States, 15-2976 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 15-2976
Visitors: 50
Filed: Apr. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2976 _ James Melvin Lewis lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: April 4, 2016 Filed: April 7, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. James Lewis appeals after the District Court1 dismissed for failure to s
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2976 _ James Melvin Lewis lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: April 4, 2016 Filed: April 7, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. James Lewis appeals after the District Court1 dismissed for failure to st..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2976
___________________________
James Melvin Lewis
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: April 4, 2016
Filed: April 7, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
James Lewis appeals after the District Court1 dismissed for failure to state a
claim his pro se Federal Tort Claims Act complaint alleging elder abuse by a
1
The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
Department of Veterans Affairs physician. We conclude, contrary to Lewis’s
arguments on appeal, that the District Court had jurisdiction to consider the United
States’s defenses to Lewis’s claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1) (granting district
courts jurisdiction over civil actions for damages brought against the United States).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
Source: CourtListener