Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3289 _ Amie Reeves lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: May 24, 2016 Filed: May 27, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Amie Reeves appeals the district
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3289 _ Amie Reeves lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: May 24, 2016 Filed: May 27, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Amie Reeves appeals the district c..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3289
___________________________
Amie Reeves
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: May 24, 2016
Filed: May 27, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Amie Reeves appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of
supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Upon de novo
1
The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
review, see Lott v. Colvin,
772 F.3d 546, 548-49 (8th Cir. 2014), we conclude that
the two narrow issues Ms. Reeves identifies do not provide a basis for reversing the
administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) determination that she is not disabled. To warrant
remand, a claimant must show prejudice from an error during administrative
proceedings, see Samons v. Astrue,
497 F.3d 813, 821 (8th Cir. 2007); and an ALJ’s
failure to cite certain evidence does not indicate that the evidence was not considered,
see Craig v. Apfel,
212 F.3d 433, 436 (8th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district
court is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-