Filed: Oct. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3669 _ Simon Velasquez Cansinos, lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner, v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent. _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: September 6, 2016 Filed: October 5, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Simon Velasquez-Cansinos petitions for review of a
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3669 _ Simon Velasquez Cansinos, lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner, v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent. _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: September 6, 2016 Filed: October 5, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Simon Velasquez-Cansinos petitions for review of an..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3669
___________________________
Simon Velasquez Cansinos,
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner,
v.
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States,
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent.
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: September 6, 2016
Filed: October 5, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Simon Velasquez-Cansinos petitions for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s denial of his
application for withholding of removal. After careful consideration, we conclude that
substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the agency’s determination that
Velasquez-Cansinos failed to establish a clear probability of persecution in Guatemala
due to a protected ground. See Ezeagwu v. Mukasey,
537 F.3d 836, 839 (8th Cir.
2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-