Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3756 _ Bryan Anthony Reo lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Martin Lindstedt lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin _ Submitted: May 6, 2016 Filed: May 25, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Missouri resident Martin Lindstedt, the defendant in the instant case, appeals the district cou
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3756 _ Bryan Anthony Reo lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Martin Lindstedt lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin _ Submitted: May 6, 2016 Filed: May 25, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Missouri resident Martin Lindstedt, the defendant in the instant case, appeals the district cour..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3756
___________________________
Bryan Anthony Reo
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Martin Lindstedt
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin
____________
Submitted: May 6, 2016
Filed: May 25, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri resident Martin Lindstedt, the defendant in the instant case, appeals
the district court’s1 dismissal of plaintiff Bryan Reo’s pro se action raising claims
1
The Honorable Matt Jeffrey Whitworth, United States Magistrate Judge for
the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition
by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq., and
state law. Having carefully reviewed the record and Lindstedt’s arguments on appeal,
we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R.
47B. We deny as moot Lindstedt’s appellate motions and requests for relief.
______________________________
-2-