Filed: Apr. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3761 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Rena Shannell Kirk lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport _ Submitted: April 14, 2016 Filed: April 19, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Rena Kirk challenges the reasonableness of the sentence the district cou
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3761 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Rena Shannell Kirk lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport _ Submitted: April 14, 2016 Filed: April 19, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Rena Kirk challenges the reasonableness of the sentence the district cour..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3761
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Rena Shannell Kirk
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
____________
Submitted: April 14, 2016
Filed: April 19, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Rena Kirk challenges the reasonableness of the sentence the district court1
imposed upon revoking her supervised release. Upon careful review, we conclude
1
The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Iowa.
that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d
910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing appellate review of revocation sentence); see
also United States v. Lazarski,
560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009) (when court imposed
below-Guidelines-range sentence, it was “nearly inconceivable” that court abused its
discretion in not varying downward still further).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We also grant counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-