Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Rashad McKay, 16-1048 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-1048 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jul. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1048 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Rashad McKay, also known as Rashod McKay lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: July 19, 2016 Filed: July 22, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Rashad McKay appeals after the district court1 denied him a sent
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 16-1048
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                  Rashad McKay, also known as Rashod McKay

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                      for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                                 ____________

                              Submitted: July 19, 2016
                                Filed: July 22, 2016
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Rashad McKay appeals after the district court1 denied him a sentence reduction
under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c)(2). Following careful de novo review, see United States

      1
      The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of
Nebraska.
v. Long, 
757 F.3d 762
, 763 (8th Cir. 2014), we find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer