Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Tracy Vaughn, 16-1060 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-1060 Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1060 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Tracy Vaughn, also known as Chopper lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: August 19, 2016 Filed: August 24, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Tracy Vaughn appeals after the district court1 denied his motion for
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 16-1060
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                      Tracy Vaughn, also known as Chopper

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                       for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: August 19, 2016
                              Filed: August 24, 2016
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Tracy Vaughn appeals after the district court1 denied his motion for a sentence
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). After careful de novo review of the record,

      1
        The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska.
we find no reason to reverse the district court’s denial of Vaughn’s motion for a
sentence reduction. See United States v. Logan, 
710 F.3d 856
, 857 (8th Cir. 2013)
(appeals court reviews de novo district court’s determination that movant was not
eligible for reduction under § 3582(c)(2)).

      Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Vaughn’s pro
se objection to submission of this appeal without oral argument is denied.
                      ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer