Filed: Aug. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1063 _ Stephen Bloomer; Karla Harksen lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Joe Caffrey, Scott County Deputy Sheriff; Scott County Iowa; Unknown Defendants lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees Henry W. Latham, II lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport _ Submitted: August 17, 2016 Filed: August 22, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BE
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1063 _ Stephen Bloomer; Karla Harksen lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Joe Caffrey, Scott County Deputy Sheriff; Scott County Iowa; Unknown Defendants lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees Henry W. Latham, II lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport _ Submitted: August 17, 2016 Filed: August 22, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BEN..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1063
___________________________
Stephen Bloomer; Karla Harksen
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Joe Caffrey, Scott County Deputy Sheriff; Scott County Iowa; Unknown
Defendants
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
Henry W. Latham, II
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
____________
Submitted: August 17, 2016
Filed: August 22, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Stephen Bloomer and his mother, Karla Harksen, appeal the district court’s1
adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
This court reviewed the record de novo and carefully considered the arguments
for reversal. Summary judgment was proper. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester,
643
F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (de novo standard of review; summary
judgment is appropriate if record, viewing facts and inferences in light most favorable
to nonmoving party, shows there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and
moving party is entitled to judgment as matter of law).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
-2-