Charles Swift v. Walmart, 16-2145 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 16-2145
Visitors: 53
Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-2145 _ Charles Swift lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Walmart lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: October 3, 2016 Filed: October 6, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Swift appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal without prejudice of his pro se diversity
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-2145 _ Charles Swift lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Walmart lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: October 3, 2016 Filed: October 6, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Swift appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal without prejudice of his pro se diversity ..
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2145 ___________________________ Charles Swift lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Walmart lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: October 3, 2016 Filed: October 6, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Charles Swift appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal without prejudice of his pro se diversity complaint. The court dismissed the complaint after 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. Swift failed to comply with the court’s order to provide evidence of damages sufficient to invoke diversity jurisdiction. Having carefully considered the record, and given the without-prejudice nature of the dismissal, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing without prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Source: CourtListener
