Filed: Jun. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1872 _ Derrick D. Howard lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: June 1, 2017 Filed: June 16, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Derrick D. Howard appeals following the district court’s1 ad
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1872 _ Derrick D. Howard lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: June 1, 2017 Filed: June 16, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Derrick D. Howard appeals following the district court’s1 adv..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-1872
___________________________
Derrick D. Howard
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: June 1, 2017
Filed: June 16, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Derrick D. Howard appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in this diversity action. Viewing the record in a light most favorable to Mr.
1
The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
Howard, with all reasonable inferences drawn in his favor, we conclude that summary
judgment was warranted. See Loch v. City of Litchfield,
689 F.3d 961, 965 (8th Cir.
2012) (de novo review). We affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R.
47B; and we deny Mr. Howard’s motion for remand.
______________________________
-2-