United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 16-1478
                     ___________________________

                          United States of America

                    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                       v.

                                Marcus Chiles

                   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
                                   ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                              ____________

                       Submitted: December 30, 2016
                          Filed: January 5, 2017
                              [Unpublished]
                              ____________

Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Marcus Chiles appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded
guilty to a drug charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under
Anders v. California, 

(1967), challenging the length of the sentence.

       Chiles pleaded guilty after entering into a written plea agreement containing
an appeal waiver. We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United
States v. Scott, 

, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and
applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 

, 890-92 (8th
Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers). Furthermore, we
have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 

(1988),
and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s
motion, and we dismiss this appeal.
                       ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.

                                         -2-