Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Long Chhang v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company, 16-1487 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-1487 Visitors: 29
Filed: Mar. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1487 _ Long Chhang; Sopheap Pen, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-QS5, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: February 21, 2017 Filed: March 2, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before COLL
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                              For the Eighth Circuit
                          ___________________________

                                  No. 16-1487
                          ___________________________

                            Long Chhang; Sopheap Pen,

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants,

                                            v.

  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for Residential Accredit
    Loans, Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-QS5,

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
                                        ____________

                      Appeal from United States District Court
                     for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
                                    ____________

                            Submitted: February 21, 2017
                               Filed: March 2, 2017
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Long Chhang and Sopheap Pen appeal pro se after the district court1 entered
an adverse judgment following a bench trial in their action to quiet title. Upon careful

      1
      The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
review, we conclude the district court’s factual determination that Pen was served
notice was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Missouri, 
535 F.3d 844
, 848
(8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer