Filed: Mar. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1487 _ Long Chhang; Sopheap Pen, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-QS5, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: February 21, 2017 Filed: March 2, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before COLL
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1487 _ Long Chhang; Sopheap Pen, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-QS5, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: February 21, 2017 Filed: March 2, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLO..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1487
___________________________
Long Chhang; Sopheap Pen,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for Residential Accredit
Loans, Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-QS5,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: February 21, 2017
Filed: March 2, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Long Chhang and Sopheap Pen appeal pro se after the district court1 entered
an adverse judgment following a bench trial in their action to quiet title. Upon careful
1
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
review, we conclude the district court’s factual determination that Pen was served
notice was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Missouri,
535 F.3d 844, 848
(8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-