Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas Ginn v. C v. Rivera, 16-1881 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-1881 Visitors: 39
Filed: Jan. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1881 _ Thomas S. Ginn, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C.V. Rivera, Warden, FCC - Forrest City Low, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: December 27, 2016 Filed: January 4, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Thomas Ginn appeals the district c
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 16-1881
                         ___________________________

                                   Thomas S. Ginn,

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

                                            v.

                  C.V. Rivera, Warden, FCC - Forrest City Low,

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
                                  ____________

                           Submitted: December 27, 2016
                              Filed: January 4, 2017
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Federal inmate Thomas Ginn appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he requested federal sentence credit for time that he

      1
       The Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
spent in custody from January 20, 2010, through September 12, 2013. Upon careful
de novo review, see Mitchell v. United States Parole Comm’n, 
538 F.3d 948
, 951(8th
Cir. 2008), we agree with the district court’s reasoning and conclusion that habeas
relief was not warranted. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer