Filed: Mar. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3265 _ Gary Black lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: March 2, 2017 Filed: March 13, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Gary Black appeals following the district court’s
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3265 _ Gary Black lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: March 2, 2017 Filed: March 13, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Gary Black appeals following the district court’s1..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3265
___________________________
Gary Black
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: March 2, 2017
Filed: March 13, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Gary Black appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his diversity action. After careful review of the record below, the parties’
1
The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Court Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
submissions on appeal, and the issues properly before us, see Beaulieu v. Ludeman,
690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review in reviewing grant of
summary judgment), we conclude that the district court properly granted summary
judgment on the record before it, and that Black’s arguments for reversal lack merit.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-