Clayton Walker v. Joseph Harmon, 16-3928 (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 16-3928
Visitors: 49
Filed: Jun. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3928 _ Clayton Walker lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Joseph Harmon, individual capacity; Black Hills Fugitive Task Force lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City _ Submitted: May 25, 2017 Filed: June 2, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Clayton Walker appeals following the dis
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3928 _ Clayton Walker lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Joseph Harmon, individual capacity; Black Hills Fugitive Task Force lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City _ Submitted: May 25, 2017 Filed: June 2, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Clayton Walker appeals following the dist..
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3928 ___________________________ Clayton Walker lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Joseph Harmon, individual capacity; Black Hills Fugitive Task Force lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City ____________ Submitted: May 25, 2017 Filed: June 2, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Clayton Walker appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se civil complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we find 1 The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. no error warranting reversal. We therefore affirm the judgment entered in favor of defendants. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Source: CourtListener
