Filed: Apr. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3951 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Paul Vigliotti lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: April 14, 2017 Filed: April 19, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Vigliotti directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upo
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3951 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Paul Vigliotti lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: April 14, 2017 Filed: April 19, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Vigliotti directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3951
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Paul Vigliotti
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: April 14, 2017
Filed: April 19, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Paul Vigliotti directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon
revoking his supervised release. His revocation sentence is composed of a ten-month
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
prison term, plus a ten-year term of supervised release, with conditions. His counsel
has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging Vigliotti’s
supervised-release term as unduly long. Vigliotti has filed a pro se brief challenging
two special conditions of supervised release, and also challenging the length of his
supervised-release term.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in imposing Vigliotti’s revocation sentence, including the
challenged aspects of the supervised release. See United States v. Asalati,
615 F.3d
1001, 1006-07 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review for substantive reasonableness of
length of supervision); United States v. Simons,
614 F.3d 475, 478-79 (8th Cir. 2010)
(standard of review for imposition of special conditions of supervised release). We
affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-