Filed: Aug. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1262 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Frank James Godino lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield _ Submitted: August 16, 2017 Filed: August 22, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Frank Godino appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his supervi
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1262 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Frank James Godino lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield _ Submitted: August 16, 2017 Filed: August 22, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Frank Godino appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his supervis..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1262
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Frank James Godino
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: August 16, 2017
Filed: August 22, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Frank Godino appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his supervised release
and imposing a 10-month sentence. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief questioning the reasonableness of Godino’s revocation sentence.
1
The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
We conclude from our review of the record that the district court did not abuse
its discretion in sentencing Godino. See United States v. Johnson,
827 F.3d 740, 744
(8th Cir. 2016) (appellate court reviews district court’s revocation sentence under
abuse-of-discretion standard); United States v. Larison,
432 F.3d 921, 922-24 (8th
Cir. 2006) (revocation sentence may be unreasonable if district court fails to consider
relevant § 3553(a) factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or
commits clear error of judgment).
The judgment is affirmed, and counsel is granted leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-