Filed: Sep. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1670 _ Karen Villa lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: September 25, 2017 Filed: September 28, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Karen Villa appeals the district court’s
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1670 _ Karen Villa lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: September 25, 2017 Filed: September 28, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Karen Villa appeals the district court’s1..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1670
___________________________
Karen Villa
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: September 25, 2017
Filed: September 28, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Karen Villa appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability
insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find
1
The Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the
District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
no basis, and Villa offers none, for overturning the district court’s determination that
substantial evidence supported the denial. See Gann v. Berryhill,
864 F.3d 947, 950-
51 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing de novo district court’s decision to affirm denial of
disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income; by statute,
Commissioner’s findings as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, are
conclusive). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________
-2-