Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1878 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Michael Lee Haynes lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines _ Submitted: November 21, 2017 Filed: November 28, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Lee Haynes appeals the within-Guidelines sentence the distr
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1878 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Michael Lee Haynes lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines _ Submitted: November 21, 2017 Filed: November 28, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Lee Haynes appeals the within-Guidelines sentence the distri..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1878
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Michael Lee Haynes
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: November 21, 2017
Filed: November 28, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Lee Haynes appeals the within-Guidelines sentence the district court1
imposed upon revoking his supervised release. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, this court affirms.
1
The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
Haynes’s counsel has filed a brief asserting that there are no nonfrivolous
issues for appeal, and moved to withdraw. After careful review of the record, this
court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing
Haynes. See United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard
of review); United States v. Petreikis,
551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying
presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines
range).
The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
______________________________
-2-