Filed: Dec. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1908 _ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. William Leo Yancey, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: November 24, 2017 Filed: December 11, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. William Yancey appeals after he pled guilty to a drug-related
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1908 _ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. William Leo Yancey, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: November 24, 2017 Filed: December 11, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. William Yancey appeals after he pled guilty to a drug-related ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1908
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
William Leo Yancey,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: November 24, 2017
Filed: December 11, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
William Yancey appeals after he pled guilty to a drug-related offense and the
district court1 sentenced him to 188 months in prison, a term within the calculated
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
Guidelines range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief
under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), questioning the reasonableness of
Yancey’s prison term. Yancey has not filed a supplemental brief.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a
substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. David,
682 F.3d 1074,
1076-77 (8th Cir. 2012) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions); see
also United States v. Callaway,
762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (on appeal,
within-Guidelines sentence may be presumed reasonable). In addition, we have
independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), and
have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s
motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
-2-