Filed: Jan. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1163 _ Dorothy E. Petris lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: December 27, 2017 Filed: January 2, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dorothy E. Petris appeals the order of
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1163 _ Dorothy E. Petris lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: December 27, 2017 Filed: January 2, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dorothy E. Petris appeals the order of t..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1163
___________________________
Dorothy E. Petris
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: December 27, 2017
Filed: January 2, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Dorothy E. Petris appeals the order of the district court1 affirming the
Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. For reversal, Petris
1
The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
challenges the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) physical and mental residual
function capacity findings. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and the record
before us, we conclude that the ALJ’s determinations are supported by substantial
competent evidence on the record as a whole and that Petris’s arguments do not
support reversal. See Wildman v. Astrue,
596 F.3d 959, 969 (8th Cir. 2010). The
judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-