Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Shaunpen Zhou v. IBM Corporation, 17-1802 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-1802 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1802 _ Shaunpen Zhou lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. International Business Machines Corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque _ Submitted: December 28, 2017 Filed: January 12, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Shaunpen Zhou appeals after the district court1 adverse
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 17-1802
                        ___________________________

                                  Shaunpen Zhou

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

                  International Business Machines Corporation

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                                     ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque
                                 ____________

                         Submitted: December 28, 2017
                            Filed: January 12, 2018
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

     Shaunpen Zhou appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination action.


      1
       The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
       After careful de novo review, see Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp., 
670 F.3d 844
,
852 (8th Cir. 2012), we conclude that the district court’s disposition of Zhou’s claims
was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                         ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer