Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1802 _ Shaunpen Zhou lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. International Business Machines Corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque _ Submitted: December 28, 2017 Filed: January 12, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Shaunpen Zhou appeals after the district court1 adverse
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1802 _ Shaunpen Zhou lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. International Business Machines Corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque _ Submitted: December 28, 2017 Filed: January 12, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Shaunpen Zhou appeals after the district court1 adversel..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1802
___________________________
Shaunpen Zhou
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
International Business Machines Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque
____________
Submitted: December 28, 2017
Filed: January 12, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Shaunpen Zhou appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination action.
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
After careful de novo review, see Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp.,
670 F.3d 844,
852 (8th Cir. 2012), we conclude that the district court’s disposition of Zhou’s claims
was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-