Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2255 _ Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, as Representative Payee for M.J.S., lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff, v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: April 26, 2018 Filed: May 2, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Bef
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2255 _ Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, as Representative Payee for M.J.S., lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff, v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: April 26, 2018 Filed: May 2, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Befo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2255
___________________________
Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, as Representative Payee for M.J.S.,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff,
v.
Commissioner, Social Security Administration,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: April 26, 2018
Filed: May 2, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley seeks to appeal the district court’s1
dismissal of her case without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate
jurisdiction, because Stanley’s notice of appeal was not filed within sixty days of the
entry of judgment on March 29, 2017. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B)(iii); FTC v.
Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.,
344 U.S. 206, 211-12 (1952); see also Dieser
v. Cont’l Cas. Co.,
440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2006).
______________________________
1
The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, United States Magistrate Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-