Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ellen E. Packenham Stanley v. Commissioner, Social Security, 17-2255 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-2255 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2255 _ Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, as Representative Payee for M.J.S., lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff, v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: April 26, 2018 Filed: May 2, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Bef
More
               United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eighth Circuit
                      ___________________________

                              No. 17-2255
                      ___________________________

                     Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley,

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

    Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley, as Representative Payee for M.J.S.,

                            lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff,

                                          v.

                Commissioner, Social Security Administration,

                    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
                                    ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
                                 ____________

                           Submitted: April 26, 2018
                             Filed: May 2, 2018
                               [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________
PER CURIAM.

       Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley seeks to appeal the district court’s1
dismissal of her case without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate
jurisdiction, because Stanley’s notice of appeal was not filed within sixty days of the
entry of judgment on March 29, 2017. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B)(iii); FTC v.
Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 
344 U.S. 206
, 211-12 (1952); see also Dieser
v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 
440 F.3d 920
, 923 (8th Cir. 2006).
                       ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, United States Magistrate Judge for the District
of Minnesota.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer