Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2320 _ Victoria L. Haynes lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Jack Wagoner, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro _ Submitted: May 30, 2018 Filed: June 4, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 dismissa
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2320 _ Victoria L. Haynes lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Jack Wagoner, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro _ Submitted: May 30, 2018 Filed: June 4, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 dismissal..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2320
___________________________
Victoria L. Haynes
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Jack Wagoner, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro
____________
Submitted: May 30, 2018
Filed: June 4, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her diversity legal
malpractice action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Upon de novo
1
The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Arkansas.
review, see Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. FDIC,
708 F.3d 1011, 1016 (8th Cir. 2013)
standard of review for dismissal based on failure to state claim); Sloan v. Motorists
Mut. Ins. Co.,
368 F.3d 853, 854 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review for district
court’s application of state law in diversity case), we agree that the action is time-
barred. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-