Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Victoria Haynes v. Jack Wagoner, III, 17-2320 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-2320 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2320 _ Victoria L. Haynes lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Jack Wagoner, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro _ Submitted: May 30, 2018 Filed: June 4, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 dismissa
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 17-2320
                         ___________________________

                                  Victoria L. Haynes

                         lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                             v.

                    Jack Wagoner, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A.

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                        ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro
                                   ____________

                              Submitted: May 30, 2018
                                Filed: June 4, 2018
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                       ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her diversity legal
malpractice action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Upon de novo


      1
       The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Arkansas.
review, see Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. FDIC, 
708 F.3d 1011
, 1016 (8th Cir. 2013)
standard of review for dismissal based on failure to state claim); Sloan v. Motorists
Mut. Ins. Co., 
368 F.3d 853
, 854 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review for district
court’s application of state law in diversity case), we agree that the action is time-
barred. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer