Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

John Doe v. University of Arkansas, 17-2328 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-2328 Visitors: 35
Filed: Mar. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2328 _ John Doe lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. University of Arkansas; University of Arkansas Board of Trustees; Donald R. Bobbitt; University of Arkansas Medical Sciences lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville _ Submitted: January 30, 2018 Filed: March 2, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circu
More
                United States Court of Appeals
                           For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 17-2328
                       ___________________________

                                     John Doe

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

  University of Arkansas; University of Arkansas Board of Trustees; Donald R.
                Bobbitt; University of Arkansas Medical Sciences

                    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                     ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
               for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
                                ____________

                          Submitted: January 30, 2018
                            Filed: March 2, 2018
                                [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.
       John Doe appeals the district court’s1 pre-service denial of his motion to file
suit under a pseudonym, and dismissal of his complaint alleging discrimination based
on his bipolar disorder diagnosis. Having reviewed the record and Doe’s arguments
on appeal, we find no abuse of discretion. See Doe v. Vill. of Deerfield, 
819 F.3d 372
, 376 (7th Cir. 2016) (standard of review); Doe v. Porter, 
370 F.3d 558
, 560 (6th
Cir. 2004) (standard of review).

      Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer