Filed: Aug. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2766 _ Larry L. Norman, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison _ Submitted: April 24, 2018 Filed: August 14, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Larry L. Norman, Jr., appeals from the order
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2766 _ Larry L. Norman, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison _ Submitted: April 24, 2018 Filed: August 14, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Larry L. Norman, Jr., appeals from the order o..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2766
___________________________
Larry L. Norman, Jr.
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
____________
Submitted: April 24, 2018
Filed: August 14, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Larry L. Norman, Jr., appeals from the order of the District Court1 affirming the
Commissioner’s denial of his applications for disability insurance benefits and
supplemental security income. For reversal, he contends that (1) the administrative
law judge (ALJ) erred in failing to find that he met or functionally equaled Listing
12.04; (2) the ALJ erred in failing to make a proper credibility finding; and (3) the
ALJ’s residual functional capacity determination was not supported by substantial
evidence. After de novo review, we reject Norman’s arguments and conclude that
substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the decision to deny benefits.
See Perks v. Astrue,
687 F.3d 1086, 1091 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review). We
affirm the judgment.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-