Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Randolph Rabbe v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc, 17-2906 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-2906 Visitors: 59
Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2906 _ Randolph Michael Rabbe; Lisa Ann Rabbe lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.; Wells Fargo, N.A. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: April 27, 2018 Filed: May 2, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this removed action, Randolph and
More
              United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 17-2906
                     ___________________________

                 Randolph Michael Rabbe; Lisa Ann Rabbe

                   lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants

                                       v.

            Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.; Wells Fargo, N.A.

                   lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                   ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                              ____________

                         Submitted: April 27, 2018
                            Filed: May 2, 2018
                              [Unpublished]
                              ____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.
      In this removed action, Randolph and Lisa Rabbe appeal after the district court1
denied them leave to amend their complaint, and adversely granted judgment on the
pleadings. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1291, this court affirms.

       This court concludes that the denial of leave to amend was proper, and that the
grant of judgment on the pleadings was correct for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Popoalii v. Corr. Med. Servs., 
512 F.3d 488
, 497 (8th Cir. 2008) (court
may deny motion to amend when amendment would be futile), Poehl v. Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc., 
528 F.3d 1093
, 1096 (8th Cir. 2008) (grant of judgment on the
pleadings reviewed de novo); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 
556 U.S. 662
, 678 (2009)
(pleading must contain sufficient facts to state claim that is plausible on its face).

      The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer