Filed: Jul. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2961 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: June 11, 2018 Filed: July 9, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud and recei
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2961 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: June 11, 2018 Filed: July 9, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud and receiv..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2961
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: June 11, 2018
Filed: July 9, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud and
received a sentence of 50 months in prison. Oladele challenges his sentence, arguing
that the district court1 committed procedural error and that his sentence is
substantively unreasonable. After a careful review of the record, we reject both
arguments, particularly given that the court imposed a below-Guidelines-range
sentence. See United States v. Chavarria-Ortiz,
828 F.3d 668, 671–72 (8th Cir. 2016)
(approving of a similar explanation for a within-Guidelines-range sentence); United
States v. Lazarski,
560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009) (“[I]t is nearly inconceivable
that the court abused its discretion in [sentencing below the Guidelines and] not
varying downward still further.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
-2-