Filed: May 14, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2982 _ Anthony Wayne Marshall lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Karen Grant, LPN, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2; Monte Munyan, LPN, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2; Scott Huffman, Lieutenant, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: May 9, 2018 Filed: May
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2982 _ Anthony Wayne Marshall lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Karen Grant, LPN, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2; Monte Munyan, LPN, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2; Scott Huffman, Lieutenant, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: May 9, 2018 Filed: May ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2982
___________________________
Anthony Wayne Marshall
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Karen Grant, LPN, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2; Monte Munyan,
LPN, Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2; Scott Huffman, Lieutenant,
Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 2
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: May 9, 2018
Filed: May 14, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Marshall, who was formerly confined at the Faulkner County
Regional Detention Center, appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, this
court concludes that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See
Peterson v. Kopp,
754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary judgment is
reviewed de novo; record is viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Beth M. Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-