Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3371 _ Joel Marvin Munt lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nanette Larson; Kathy Reid; Shelly Monio; Kim Ebeling; Doctors #1-6; Health Services Workers #1-6; Opticians #1-4; RN #1 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: October 11, 2018 Filed: October 16, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circui
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3371 _ Joel Marvin Munt lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nanette Larson; Kathy Reid; Shelly Monio; Kim Ebeling; Doctors #1-6; Health Services Workers #1-6; Opticians #1-4; RN #1 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: October 11, 2018 Filed: October 16, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-3371
___________________________
Joel Marvin Munt
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nanette Larson; Kathy Reid; Shelly Monio; Kim Ebeling; Doctors #1-6; Health
Services Workers #1-6; Opticians #1-4; RN #1
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: October 11, 2018
Filed: October 16, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota inmate Joel Marvin Munt appeals following the district court’s1
adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Viewing the
record in a light most favorable to Munt, and giving him the benefit of all reasonable
inferences, we agree with the district court that defendants were entitled to summary
judgment on Munt’s claims under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments, and
the Americans with Disabilities Act. See Murchison v. Rogers,
779 F.3d 882, 886-87
(8th Cir. 2015) (de novo review). We also find no error in the other district court
rulings Munt challenges in this court. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-