Filed: May 08, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3414 _ Wilfrido Juan Pujols, also known as Wil Pujols lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Pujols Family Foundation; Deidre Pujols, in her individual capacity; Jose Alberto Pujols, in his individual capacity, also known as Albert Pujols lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: May 3, 2018 Filed: May 8, 2018 [Unpublis
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3414 _ Wilfrido Juan Pujols, also known as Wil Pujols lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Pujols Family Foundation; Deidre Pujols, in her individual capacity; Jose Alberto Pujols, in his individual capacity, also known as Albert Pujols lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: May 3, 2018 Filed: May 8, 2018 [Unpublish..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-3414
___________________________
Wilfrido Juan Pujols, also known as Wil Pujols
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Pujols Family Foundation; Deidre Pujols, in her individual capacity; Jose Alberto
Pujols, in his individual capacity, also known as Albert Pujols
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: May 3, 2018
Filed: May 8, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Wilfrido Pujols appeals the district court’s1 dismissal with prejudice of his
diversity action asserting state-law claims for libel and slander. Having reviewed the
record and the parties’ filings, we agree, for the reasons stated by the district court,
that Pujols failed to state a claim for either libel or slander. See Martin v. Iowa,
752
F.3d 725, 727 (8th Cir. 2014) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal is reviewed de
novo). We further conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the action with
prejudice. See Ahmed v. United States,
147 F.3d 791, 797 (8th Cir. 1998) (dismissal
for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) is
adjudication on the merits; dismissal with prejudice is appropriate).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-